I wrote about muscle and metabolic rate in a post about a year ago, but this myth is so prevalent that I had to address it again. If you don’t know what I’m referring to it is the idea that it is smart to gain muscle, because “muscle burns calories around the clock…helping you lose fat”. You know you have heard this mantra from a personal trainer before! It is so common that I listen for it now and just smile when I hear it. I am going to have some fun with this post. I love “shaking things up”!
[“Don’t hate us because we are beautiful. We are just trying to help make the Internet a prettier place.”]
Did You Know that Body Fat Increases Your Metabolic Rate?
Seriously…one pound of fat burns an additional 2 calories per pound per day. So if you gained 10 pounds of fat, you will burn another 20 calories per day. Obviously if fat loss is the goal, you wouldn’t want to gain more fat to increase your metabolic rate. I just wanted to throw this out there to let you know that things aren’t always as simple as they seem.
How Many Calories Are Burned Per Day Per Pound of Muscle?
Muscle burns an additional 6 calories per day. I actually quoted 12 calories per day in my earlier post, but with further research it looks like 6 is the more accurate number. People don’t agree on the exact number, but 6 looks like a good average. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition has it close to 5 and I’ve seen other studies where it is a bit higher. Bottom line…muscle doesn’t increase your metabolism THAT much.
Let’s Put This Into Perspective
If someone loses 20 pounds of fat, they will burn 40 LESS calories per day. A 10 pound muscle gain would burn 60 calories per day. A person who had this type of body composition change would burn a grand total of 20 more calories per day! If that same person lost 20 pounds of fat and gained 20 pounds of muscle, they would only increase their daily calories burned by 80 total calories! Not exciting at all!
How Many Calories Burned to Lose a Pound of Fat?
It takes 3,500 calories burned to lose a pound of fat. An extra 20 calories per day isn’t going to make a dent in your body composition. It isn’t even significant! All of that time devoted to gaining muscle could be put towards cardio and the results would blow the “muscle gain” approach out of the water.
Cardio and Calorie Deficit is a Direct Route to Fat Loss
You can easily burn 600 calories doing hard cardio. Since you aren’t trying to build muscle, you can also reduce your daily calories 600 under maintenance level and hold on to the muscle while losing weight. So this cardio and diet combination can burn an additional 1,200 calories per day (I realize that this is vastly simplified…I just didn’t want to make this post too technical). This is 60 times as many calories burned compared to the body composition example listed above cause by gaining muscle.
I Realize That Cardio and Diet Aren’t Exactly 60 Times Better
Obviously I didn’t take into account the calories burned doing extra lifting and all the other variables. The main point I wanted to make is that gaining muscle to burn body fat is not the quickest way to getting a defined body. If you want to burn fat, focus on burning the calories directly (hint: cardio). Just because it sounds cool to say…”gaining muscle helps increase your metabolism and burns more calories around the clock”…doesn’t mean it is an effective strategy.
|
High Insulin Levels Stop Fat Loss and Cause Weight Gain – It is impossible to have high levels of insulin in your system while burning fat at the same time. Think about that. If you eat a meal that has too high of a Glycemic Index, your blood sugar will spike, causing a large release in … |
Important Message: Although this site has received 25+ million visitors, I am starting from scratch and abandoning it. This site is dated and old school looking, terrible to read on mobile, etc.
It's like a Ford Pinto compared to my new site...which is like a Ferrari. Click the link to head over to my new site.
Starting Over...R.I.P. Fitness Black Book!
Thanks for reading all these years!








![Eating to Increase Your Metabolism [Pt 3]](http://fitnessblackbook.com/wp-content/plugins/codecanyon-552356-special-recent-posts-pro/cache/NjA2MG5vaW5jcmVhc2UteW91ci1tZXRhYm9saXNtMQ==.jpg)
![Eating to Increase Your Metabolism [Pt 2]](http://fitnessblackbook.com/wp-content/plugins/codecanyon-552356-special-recent-posts-pro/cache/NjA2MG5vYmlnc3RvY2stb3ZlcndlaWdodC1tYWxlLXBlcnNvbi13YWxraW5nLTI0Nzk3OTA5.jpg)
![Eating to Increase Your Metabolism [Pt 1]](http://fitnessblackbook.com/wp-content/plugins/codecanyon-552356-special-recent-posts-pro/cache/NjA2MG5vdGVlbmFnZXItd2VyZS1sZWFuLWluLXRoZS01MHM=.jpg)





{ 44 comments… read them below or add one }
← Previous Comments
Hey Rusty,
I was wondering if resistance training has to be weight lifting? I don’t have a whole lot of time to do an hour of cardio + weight training. I like the way it feels to do an hour of cardio and I wanted to continue on this path. On the other hand, I still know that I need resistance training. I was wondering if doing a variety of push-ups and pull-ups counts as resistance training for my upper body? It does feel like I get a good pump, yet I don’t think i’ll bulk up with this method which is good because i’m not looking to bulk up. What do you think?
Some points are missing. Cardio works best with well fed muscle. Well fed muscles (an anabolic state) will continue to stoke your calorie burning metabolism to work even at rest- a far better deal then having to run to get the furance going. Total well rounded fitnes- diet, cardio and strength training need to be a package.
One other point- The fear of bulking up- It is impossible to “Bulk” up with the INTENT to bulk up. No body accidently turned into a Hulk freakazoid. Relax.
Lol this article is so true. I speak of experience. I was weighing 75kg and was really into running. I could run 20km a couple of times a week and was nice and slim. At a time I had to devote time to something else and couldnt run as long but thought I would gain some fat. I started to build up muscle just split programs with heavy weight but only 20 min each time. It seemed to work well I gained muscle but because I didnt run anymore, slowly I started to gain fat. After 1,5 years I was about 100kg or more. I have stopped weightlifting. It did not burn clarories anymore than when I was at 75kg. Its a pure myth. Some would tell me then, that as a big guy I could eat anything and never get fat “just look at the bodybuilders, they are all muscle”. Its a lie and a fantasy. If there is any difference it should be, that now I weigh more and cardio exercises are 5 times as tough to do and I grow tired quicker. I started running again after a while Im up on a 7km run and I dont feel that great after like I used to.
Also, when you see those athletes on the telly and they look strong,muscular and fast. Well theyre not as heavy as you think. When you have a low body fat your muscle tend to look bigger. For example some of the 100 meter runners look pretty muscular but wait until you hear what their weight is. Same goes for sprint swimmers or just any athlete you see. You would think they were 100kg but theyre not.
Love all your advice! I’m really trying to go for a slim toned look, and i have pretty good shape, but my thighs are kinda bulky.. what can I do to eliminate bulk? should I cut out all my resistance training?
i knew this but bulking up is better than having no muscle and being a weakling. besides if you r willing to bulk you better be willing to cut fat aswell. every pound of muscle you have burns calories, about 6. if you have an additional 100 pounds of muslce then you will burn 600 calories…ofcourse alot of you probabaly dont have that much lean mass on….you have to be at least 5’8 210 pounds at around 5% bodyfat to obtain that goal
Sorry to ‘shake things up’, but this article is a bit jacked up. Hear me out.
It seems to be written by someone who buys the calories in = calories out mantra. Which is somewhat bogus. Calorie counting is a waste of brain matter. So I urge you to check your rhetoric, stop browzing bureaucratic junk science.
The short version is, fats vs. carbs. Fats cant be stored in fat tissue, carbs can. Eating fat forces your body to get its energy from fat, in turn makes it a fat burning machine. Limiting carbs amplify this effect. Even moreso, limiting your fats to short and medium chain triglycerides lessen the burden on your liver.
Consider your mind = blown. Stop poisoning the collective conscious.
Calorie counting is for people who dont understand metabolism.
The title was good and I agree. The conclusion that cardio is better than weightlifting isn’t in my opinion.
You completely ignore the calories burned during weightlifting and the calories burned in the 24 hours after the weightlifting-session, which is more then the calories during an equally long cardio-session. the little extra calories burned to maintain your muscles don’t really matter but this isn’t the reason weightlifting works at all. It’s just a promotional myth to get the masses to join in, just like crunches (for a six-pack) was 10 years ago.
← Previous Comments
{ 1 trackback }